Showing posts with label Lee Wind. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lee Wind. Show all posts

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Blogging About Blogging, Westside Writers Schmooze-Style


Waaaaay back on March 12th, the SCBWI Westside Writers Schmooze transformed the SMPL Fairview Branch community room into a Blogster’s Paradise.

The topic was blogging and social media – specifically how we, as writers, can use the internet to improve our craft, share ideas, promote ourselves and generally feel less alone in the world.

We assembled a crack panel of experts featuring Lee Wind, Nutschell Windsor and representatives from The Pen & Ink Blog.

Lee treats blogging like a job (which, technically, it is, as he heads up the official SCBWI Team Blog).  “Blogging made me feel more like a writer,” Lee said.  He tries to post 5 times a week on his personal blog (leewind.org) and twice a week for the SCBWI.

Sue Berger from The Pen & Ink Blog, who’s a published e-book author said, “If you’re published by an e-publisher, you’d better have an online presence.”  The Pen & Ink Blog began with a critique group.  They each toyed with the idea of doing a blog, and decided it’d be easier and more fun to do it together.

We learned that Nutschell’s blog, The Writing Nut, is a veritable treasure trove of interviews, writing tools and info on events for writers.



Charlie attempts to "fill in" as Greg,
naturally using a chicken as a stand-in.

In addition to the wisdom of the panel, co-coordinator Charlie Cohen had interviewed social media consultants, Greg Pincus and Laura Wallis, and chipped in their thoughts in absentia.





Read and or print the full interview HERE.

We also handed out a brief Social Media Survey.  10 Schmoozers responded and here are some of the details that came to light:

Three people blog; the others don’t – or haven’t yet.

Schmooze regular Joshua Hauke is the creator of online comic, Tales of the Brothers 3 (www.brothers3comics.com), and he posts weekly. 



Another anonymous Schmoozer blogs about “writing, on the way to being published” but admits she doesn’t post regularly.

Sarah Harroff was just starting a blog (www.sardyhar.wordpress.com) about the process of being a writer and said she hoped to post weekly.

Your very own Schmooze co-coordinator, Karol Ruth Silverstein, blogs about your very own Schmooze with her very own co-coordinator partner Charlie.  But lord knows they aren’t very regular about it.

The main reasons given for not blogging were not enough time, not enough technical know how and not having much to say or a unique enough focus. 

Nearly all respondents used Facebook daily.  Other social media sites, like Twitter and Google+, were used less.

Karol and writing partner, Boo
Overall, the evening was fun and informative, and as it turned out – very advantageous for Karol.  In her preparation leading up to this Schmooze, she decided to start trying to put her woefully neglected Twitter account to good use.  She stumbled onto a Twitter pitch event and wound up getting an agent out of it, proving just how valuable using social media can be for your writing career!

Keep an eye out for another blog post very soon (really!) and detailed info on our next Schmooze and the exciting Schmooze year ahead.

Until then, keep passing the open windows,

Charlie & Karol

Monday, May 27, 2013

STRAIGHT FROM THE SCHMOOZERS’ MOUTHS PART DEUX – RECAPPING THE NOVEL CRITIQUE SCHMOOZE


Greetings Schmoozers!



Like last month, Charlie and Karol have mostly relinquished the floor to the Schmoozers for this blog post.  Also like last month, they realized there was no way they could top the novel critique Schmmoze blog post for 2012 (read it HERE). 

The Schmoozers in action
Here are the blog post prompts we put out to the 23 brave writers in attendance:

The most important thing I learned about my manuscript was...

– Hmm, let’s just say all the information I thought was on the first page WAS NOT THERE.
CAROL BARTH

– I took a risk with my novel's voice, and the overwhelming response amongst my group was that it worked.  Beyond that, I got a very helpful suggestion to help make my opening paragraph much stronger with the addition of a single sentence.
Garrett Vander Leun

– Too much telling.
LAURIE YOUNG

– The most important thing that I learned about my piece (3 pages from a writing prompt) was that it could become a middle-grade book. I'm still smiling from the kind and encouraging feedback I received. 
CHERYL MANNING


– My transitions could be smoother.
DC

– I need to watch out for repeating what's been said. Keep the writing tight.
PATRICIA O’BRIEN

Last Leaf on the Tree Table (moderated by Charlie Cohen)
–...that it is a mistake to bring transitional scenes to a critique.  I got so sick of bringing the first 4 pages of my book I thought I'd bring the next four.  But those depend entirely on the first four to make sense.  So I wasted a lot of valuable critique time answering questions that were answered in the first four pages.  I wanted to see if there were things I could cut in the transition, but it was hard for anyone to judge, not knowing what I was transitioning from and to.  So what I learned was: Bring scenes where something happens.  Scenes that are, at least a bit, self contained.  Hmm.... Seems obvious now that I look at it, but...
CHARLIE COHEN

The "No You Can't Sit at Our Table" Table 
(moderated by Karol Ruth Silverstein)
– That, for a lesser writer, bringing a scene 100 pages into a manuscript to a critique might not work, but for brilliant old me…  No seriously, the thing I got was confirmation that the pivotal scene I brought
is coming across as awkwardly and honestly as I’d hoped.
KAROL RUTH SILVERTEIN


The most important thing I learned about writing for middle grade kids / teens was...

– You will be properly ridiculed if your main character says she lives on THE WESTSIDE.
CAROL BARTH

– In spite of my novel's unique and 'successful' voice, I still need to moderate how fully I use it because it could lead to comprehension problems for younger readers. 
GARRETT VANDER LEUN

– Be careful with word choice/vocabulary in your writing.   
Four Fatal Femmes Table (moderated by Laurie Young)

– Not to front-load the manuscript with background information. Dive head first into the mess and sprinkle background information as needed. Hook 'em from page one.
CHERYL MANNING

– Start in the action
LAURIE YOUNG

– Anything goes.  Really.
KAROL RUTH SILVERSTEIN

– I didn't exactly learn it, but it was brought back home to me: Never write down, and never preach.  But this is true for any age, from toddler to geezer.
CHARLIE COHEN


The biggest surprise for me at the May Schmooze was...

– I was surprised by how well received my work was.  Writing is such a solitary endeavor and it's always a little gut wrenching to finally take your little monster out for a stroll.  To not have everyone gasp in horror was a wonderful surprise.
GARRETT VANDER LEUN

– I didn't offend everyone at the table with my comments. I only offended HALF the table.
CAROL BARTH

– ...how amazingly well some folks can write.  Every time I sit at a critique table with "newbies," I am amazed that there are really terrific, visionary writers out there who have not before been to our schmoozes.  I mean, real writers who, somehow, got to this level of ability without us!!  HOW does this happen??!  Does this mean Karol and I are not the sun and the moon; the mother's milk of all your creativity?  That you people are the real talents and we, just trained monkeys, who hop around for your amusement?  Well, that's probably as it should be.
CHARLIE COHEN

501st Legion - The Wolf Pack Table 
(moderated by Blue Leader AKA Jeffery Cox)
– How interesting some of the stories people are working on turned out to be. 
JOSHUA HAUKE

– How committed the participants are.
LAURIE YOUNG

– (My tablemates were) awesome speed 'critters.' Really. It's not easy to give good advice under time limits, but they excelled.
PATRICIA O’BRIEN

–  Enjoying my pages being read out loud -- thanks to the wonderful job by Mara
CHERYL MANNING

Where ideas come from?


– …What!?!  No espresso brownies?!?  Noooooooooo!!!
ANONYMOUS

The most inspiring thing I heard at the May schmooze was...

– It's incredible how patient children's writers are and the lengths they will go to TACTFULLY tell me my pages need MORE WORK.
CAROL BARTH

– That my fellow critiquers wanted to read more of my story.
LAURIE YOUNG

– There was a woman who claimed she wasn't capable of writing anything beyond a few simple short stories...  And then she brought in this amazing short story that was loaded with original characters and a very unique plot that lends itself PERFECTLY to a longer-format story - - - not to mention that it only contains a handful of ideas from the author's incredible life story.  You don't know what you got until you sit down and give it a shot!  Don't say 'I can't' - just write!
GARRETT VANDER LEUN

– "Hey, they're are cookies over there." or "It's almost time for the SCBWI Summer conference."
JOSHUA HAUKE

– "COOKIES!"
CHARLIE COHEN

And a  few random thoughts/comments:

– Fresh eyes bring fresh insights. No matter how many people look at a manuscript, a new reader may see something missed by others.  It is such a pleasure to talk about writing with other writers.
PATRICIA O’BRIEN

– Inspiration works in mysterious ways. I just love being privy to the creative fruit and process of such diverse writers. Slowly, I feel my own flow desiring to be shared. And I surprise myself with all my comments during the critiques! I hope the love is clear.
DEBORAH COLE

Not Charlie's Table (moderated by Lee Wind)
– Whenever someone says you're only going to get to share the first five pages of your manuscript, there's a desire that I imagine is universal, to want to cram in more - twiddle with the margins, do a full first page - because there's a fear that if they don't see enough of it they won't 'get it.'  In our group on the novel critique night, we suggested that someone else besides the writer read the text aloud, and for one of our critique pieces, the reader only got to about three pages in before the reading time was running out.  The author commented that the person could maybe read the rest faster, but all the major points of feedback we had to give were already apparent in the first three pages.  (In fact, they were evident on the first page.)  It reminded me that as much as I, too, chafe at the idea of having my work appraised based on only a small portion, the DNA for the entire book is right there in the first three pages… the first page… and dare I say, maybe even the first few lines?  It was a good lesson to re-learn.


We couldn’t have said it better...everyone!

Huge thanks to our table monitors and to Molly Mueller for snapping all the great photos.

Join us June 12th for the niche Schmooze – where we’ll explore the road-to-publishing less traveled.  Plus – we want to hear your ideas on what Schmooze topics we should schedule for next year.

Until the, keep passing the open windows.
Charlie & Karol




Tuesday, March 19, 2013

The Westside Writers Schmooze persents 50 Shades of Blog






So ideally this month’s blog post would have been written in the style of 50 Shades of Gray, but that would've required us to get the book and read it, and the thought of that just made us tired and want to take to our beds.  And not in a good way.  So, instead, we decided to just tell you what happened. 
Well for starters, good ol’ Karol, who’d come up with this brilliant topic in the first place and had been waiting all year for this Schmooze, got deathly ill and could not attend.  Never fear though, because young Rita Crayon Huang stepped in to add a feminine counterbalance and avert the horrible prospect of “An Evening With Charlie Talking About Sex.”  As an added bonus, Karol was able to attend virtually, through speakerphone.

Karol later mused that it was just like an episode of Charlie’s Angels, except Charlie was in the room, and ”the angel” was on the phone.

It was a smaller group of Schmoozers than usual, around 15, the others scared off by the adult nature of the topic, no doubt (picture book writers are so delicate).  But it was a terrific Schmooze, nonetheless. 
We started off with a round robin of the first sexy scenes we remember reading that really impacted us.  There were lots of mentions of Judy Blume’s Forever (page 88, people!) and Mario Puzo’s The Godfather; even Erica Jong’s Fear of Flying and, uh, Bob Guccione’s Penthouse Forum, uh, came up.  (The age of the unnamed Schmoozer who copped to reading Penthouse Forum?  13.)
Charlie read some comically terrible romance writing he’d found, and we discussed what to avoid, like the words “throbbing” and “flowering” and phrases like “pink palace of pleasure.”  

Charlie read a great quote Karol had sent in from a Dear Editor.com post which suggested that, if you start from emotion and character and build up to the physical, the audience will be putty in your hands.
Karol then chimed in to give a full-throated (between coughs) defense of the Twilight series as an example of this, calling the work a “bodice ripping romance” rather than a supernatural vampire story.  “It’s hot because it could mean a literal death for the heroine.”  That said, she complained bitterly that, after thousands of pages of foreplay, when Edward and Bella are finally going to do the deed, there’s a nearly immediate fade to the moonlight on the ocean rather than the hot, steamy paranormal lovemaking every Twihard had long been waiting for. 

This led to a discussion of how far to go, with a sampling of various scenes, from the “Fade to Black/Jaws Approach” (implying but not showing the shark) of Harry Potter & The Order of the Phoenix to the explicit full frontal passion of Jenny Downham’s Before I Die.   

Along the way, Charlie insisted deference be paid to Sherman Alexie’s long overdue salute to masturbation in The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian, and Frank Portman’s awkward, and very specific, make out scenes in King Dork.  Comparing them to the swoony, sexy and emotional scenes in books like Jennifer Bosworth’s Struck, Charlie posited the notion that women write about sex as an overpowering force that takes them away, whereas men write about logistics: this goes here and that goes there, and if I grab this and fiddle with that, then that happens… etc. Rita noted that a lot of guys in the room began nodding vigorously, saying they much preferred scenes written the latter way.

At this point, a fight broke out.
Lee Wind wasn’t so sure that this was always the case, arguing that the lead character in King Dork was simply distant from his emotions.  Jeff Cox sided with Charlie, saying that this was how young sex was for him.  After we shook from our minds the image of young Jeff Cox having awkward young sex, Rita countered Lee's response by saying the emotion that connected her to the character in King Dork was performance anxiety, which she found convincing.
Josh Hauke (creator of web comic, Tales Of The Brothers Three)chimed in, taking exception to Bosworth’s young heroine’s description of desire as “a thing separate from me, a wild animal with a mind of its own, attacking the bars of the cage I kept it in, looking for a weak spot.”  He argued that the wish of women in these stories to be “conquered and overpowered” was unhealthy and a result of sexual stereotypes.  Lee agreed.  Charlie stared off wistfully, imagining what it must be like to conquer… anyone.  As for the women at the Schmooze, they seemed to take greater exception to the fact that all these young girls so easily achieved orgasm in their first sexual at-bats!

– –

An aside from Rita, after the Schmooze: "The Sex Schmooze was so good, I stayed up half the night afterward still thinking. I particularly loved the examples Charlie brought in of gendered Point of View differences – and the assumptions this unearthed from all of the men and women in the room! A lot of the guys took offense to the idea that the female point of view would involve sex as surrender – as opposed to liberating or empowering – and even though I and other women defended this as obvious, it really got me questioning whether I've been harboring repressive ideas without realizing it. Which got me mining my memories deeper, afterward, as well as remembering the experiences and attitudes of various friends . . . "
Said Sara Wilson Etienne after the Schmooze as well: "The best part of the night was when a woman started off, "It's all about the male gaze . . . " and it took some of us a while to figure out she meant gaze g-a-z-e and not gays . . . "

But we did talk about gays, too, as you will see . . .

– –

Rita quickly reeled in the discussion before Charlie could start talking about his first sexual at-bat and pointed us to a blog post by author Marianna Baer.  She was having difficulty writing a sex scene, so she studied sex scenes from various novels to help her break her block. 

Author Marianna Baer
This amazing post not only answers the question of “How far can I go?” but Marianna also addresses her own concern about “Where do I put their hands?”  There’s too much great stuff in it to recap here, but you owe it to yourself to click on over to it, if only to read the beautiful and explicit excerpt from Jenny Downham’s devastating aforementioned novel Before I Die, where oral sex is not only a plot point and the consummation of the book, but deeply moving as well.   

 Karol dubbed it “Coming Home for the YA set!”

After looking at all those novels, Marianna Baer came to the conclusion that the secret to writing sex scenes is to think about them not as sex scenes but just as scenes.  The hands go wherever they would go to show character and advance plot.

From there we discussed sex and the market, quoting (March Schmooze guest) SonyaSones, whose poem Ice Capades from her novel What My Mother Doesn’t Know led to the book being banned and thus selling through the roof!  Sones said she “never met a banned book list she didn’t want to be on.  I dance a happy little jig every time my book makes the cut again!”  So, shockingly, sex sells.

Things break down a little differently though, if your characters are gay.  While straight characters seem to be getting a lot of sex lately, with pressure from publishers to include more titillation, gay characters are, sadly, pressured to be more celibate.  

Lee (whose blog, I’m Here. I’m Queer. What The Hell Do I Read, you really must check out) said, “There’s definitely a straight kiss = PG13, gay kiss = R attitude that seems to be operating in our culture, and that seems to be reflected in the very few MG and YA books with major LGBTQ characters and themes.
 One exception is YA author Ellen Hopkins, who is equally revealing for all her very diverse characters in terms of their sex lives.  She treats gay and straight and bi characters the same, and I think that’s ultimately the guideline: don’t fade out at the kiss for lesbians but write pages and pages of intimate physicality for the heterosexual couple.” 
Rita thought that said it perfectly. 
Charlie stared off wistfully, thinking about lesbians kissing and pages and pages of intimate physicality…

And then it was time to go home.  Of course much more was discussed during the evening.  Near the end, the Almighty came down and revealed the secrets of connubial bliss, but to hear that you would’ve had to have been there (hint: it has nothing to do with dill pickles and chicken feathers).



Still not satiated?  Here are some more books, articles and excerpts cited in tonight's talk:

Rita brought in contrasting examples from Kristin Cashore's Graceling and Will Davis's My Side of the Story, which tied in to the discussion on character point of view and gender, whether less is always more (it depends on what you're trying to show), the power dynamic that can be involved, and when and how to give nods to safe sex.


For more on gay sex and the market - check out the “Four Levels of Sex Scenes” in the middle of this article – fascinating!


     Rita mentioned Storky, written by D. L. Garfinkle, a female author writing from the point of view of a high school guy.  This was in response to Charlie's wish to see a book truly, perhaps painfully, portray how focused many boys in high school are on a particular body part, which may or may not be cooperating at the precise moment when a guy gets called on to go to the front of the class. Rita found this scenario portrayed convincingly in  Storky and would like to know whether you do, too.




   And lastly…since apparently everyone was so completely astonished by her brilliance and not at all because she’s in any way an egomaniac and, coincidentally, the person who physically creates these blog posts…but merely because Charlie and Rita insisted…here are Karol’s kisses: 


-->
From page 319 of Cursed:

         Suddenly, he’s mashing his lips against mine, trying to put his tongue in my mouth.  I keep my lips pressed together like they’re super-glued so instead he just slimes up my face and it is gross, gross, GROSS!
         It’s over in like a millisecond.  I leap to my feet, twisting my ankle in the process. 
         “What the hell was that?” I yell.
         “It’s called kissing,” Paul says, like I’m the idiot here, but it’s his face that’s all red.  Good.  He should be embarrassed.  “I should have known a freak like you would be a lousy kisser.”

From pages 327-328 of Cursed:

         “No, dummy!” Jeremy says, “I don’t want to be just friends.”
         He laughs at me, and all I can think is – why is he laughing? –  because I don’t get it and then, after a moment, what he just said sinks in and…oh…and then I’m laughing, too, and then he’s moving closer to me, but just his face, and before I know it, I’m moving, too, just my face. 
         And then his lips, his soft lips, touch mine.
         And our mouths open, just a little, and it’s not gross, not at all, it’s…exhilarating, just like Dani and Noland said it would be.
         And then I stop thinking.


Stayed tuned to this space for our recap of March’s special guest, YA novelist Sonya Sones.

Until then,
Keep passing the open windows,
Charlie & Karol

Thursday, November 8, 2012

The Westside Writers Schmooze presents the Most Provocative Schmooze Blog Post…Ever!



Greetings, Schmoozers!  Before we launch into October’s Very Special Schmooze Subject – let’s first take a moment to acknowledge last month’s blog post on September’s Conference Recap/Query How-To Schmooze…was that an outstanding blog post or what?!  So much info and insight and inspiration and…

What's that?  You missed it?!  Well, don't worry.  So did we.  Yep, there was no blog post for September’s Schmooze.  That’s right – we blew it off.  We dropped the ball.  Shirked our duties.  Fell asleep at the wheel.  Whatever your euphemism of choice may be, we did it.  And we’re sorry.  (At least Karol’s sorry.  Charlie really doesn’t give a crap…. HEY! Last time I let Karol write the first draft of a blog post…!)

Yes – September’s Schmooze was productive and fun.  It was great to see everyone again after the break.  And we will give you some of those helpful query-themed links we promised at the end of this blog post.  But let’s face it, September is so two months ago, and October’s only one month ago, so we’ll just be moving along now.

Ahem.

On October 10th, about 28 of us gathered for what Charlie and Karol promised would be the Most Provocative Schmooze Ever.  We got off to a decidedly routine and unprovocative start with the usual introductions and announcements. 

Chief among the announcements were:

  • Registration is now open for the SCBWI National Winter Conference in New York (February 1st – 3rd).
  • The SCBWI-LA, Westside Writers Schmooze and the Santa Monica Public Library are cosponsoring a free screening of the documentary LIBRARY OF THE EARLY MIND at the main branch of the SMPL on Saturday, December 1st at 2 PM.  Flyers will be available soon; feel free to invite your friends.

We planned to get into the “meat” of our meaty topic with a reading of Greg Pincus’ A Poem For Banned Book Week (read it HERE).  Karol had permission to read the poem to the group if Greg hadn’t arrived yet, and just as she was clearing her throat, guess who walked in?  The man himself!  (This was a relief to Karol, as her Greg Pincus impersonation is sub par at best.)

The “Main Event” – a discussion of modeling desirable behavior vs. mirroring authentic (albeit often undesirable) behavior in kids’ books – was divided into three sections:

  • Language
  • Overall Story
  • Artists’ Responsibility to their audiences

Charlie and Karol decided to have a little pre-Halloween fun with the "Devil's Advocate"
and "Miss Goodie-Two-Shoes" roles they opted to play.  Photo snapped by Lee Wind.

In the Language section, Charlie began by reading an except from Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-time Indian, where Alexie had his teenaged boys referring to each other using a gay slur – and then had his main character offer a mea culpa of sorts.  Charlie argued that the justification for using the slur was not only unnecessary, but it actually lessened the authenticity and impact of the scene (where two best friends were just beginning to speak to each other again after a long feud). It was pointed out that this exchange came late in the book, so we already knew that the main character was a decent guy, rendering his mea culpa somewhat redundant. However, if we were just meeting him, the impact of the language would have been very different.


This was definitely a great way to get the conversation started.  Some Schmoozers wondered whether our audiences are sophisticated enough to understand the subtext in “controversial” dialogue and where to draw the line between authentic kids speak and providing models of the worldview that we, as artists, want to put out in the world.  Is there a difference between censorship and forced political correctness?  How did we feel about the “N-word” being replaced in Mark Twain’s classic The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn with the word "slave?" (Read the NY Times take on that here)  The general consensus among Schmoozers was that the substitution greatly decreased the potency of the racism the character of Jim had to endure – as well as the power of his eventually gaining his freedom.  Charlie argued that the words were differed in kind, not just degree, as a slave can be of any race and can be freed, whereas you can't change the color of your skin and the "N-word" speaks of racism specifically, which exists beyond the confines of slavery.

One person shared the tale of a librarian from the Midwest who couldn’t acquire a book if it featured the “F-word” in the first three pages, and several Schmoozers pointed out that, as kids, they’d often used derogatory words without knowing what the slurs actually meant.  (We all assumed today’s kids were no different.)

From there, we moved on to a broader discussion of the overall stories in kids’ books, and whether it’s optimal or optional to leave young readers with at least a modicum of hope.  Arguing for the “optimal” side of the debate, Karol gave an example from a YA novel she’d recently read that left her devastated and, honestly, a bit angry.  (We’ll leave the author and book unnamed here, to avoid spoilers and because we’d just as soon adhere to the “if you don’t have something nice to say, don’t say anything at all” adage.)  It wasn’t that she hated the book overall.  To the contrary, she found it completely engrossing and could barely put it down.  It’s just that it ended in complete and unimaginable tragedy.  Karol was quick to point out that she knew the author was known for edgy, difficult stories and that she doesn’t expect every book to end with unicorns frolicking under rainbows…but devastation?  What would a teen reader who really identified with the character and story be left with, she wondered.

A Schmoozer offered that, while he isn’t much into devastating endings in kids’ books himself, he knows that particular author has a passionate fan base, with whom she communicates regularly via social media.  And another mentioned a YA author who said he loves bleak, hopeless YA novels because he felt that way as a teen.  Charlie, again playing Devil’s Advocate, talked about the “lost chapter” in Anthony Burgess’ A Clockwork Orange, which offered a happier ending to a poignantly dreary classic.  Interestingly in this case, it was the book’s editor who refused to include the dénouement, angering Burgess.  Having read the lost chapter in an anniversary edition of the book, Charlie firmly sided with the editor, saying that the happy ending neutered the story of its impact.

We easily segued into our last Big Question of the night – what is the responsibility of an artist to his or her audience?  

Again, there were no easy answers to the questions posed, but it did seem like there was a general consensus that writers of children’s literature were in a unique position to effect positive change.  Lee Wind pointed out that the types of stories featuring GLBTQ characters had really shown growth, moving from stories with tragic endings for gay characters, to “issue books” specifically about coming out and other challenges faced by gay characters, to a more recent crop of books which feature varied storylines about characters who just happen to be gay.  Everyone pretty much agreed that children's books do have an impact, so you have a moral, as well as a creative, obligation to write stories with messages you’re willing to stand behind.  One Schmoozer felt the subject you pick to write about is, at least to some degree, the message of your book, whether you intended for that or not.  Another added his belief that, if you write children's books, you have a drive to do something meaningful for kids.  In that sense, we probably DO have some special responsibility to our audience.

The sentiment which was perhaps most prominent throughout the evening’s lively discussion is that there’s room for varied opinions on all of these topics – different readers will respond to bleak or happy endings, coarse language or the lack of it, mimicking “bad behavior” or modeling “good behavior.”  The key is that YOU, dear kids' lit writers, do not betray your own beliefs and sensibilities.  So long as you hew close to them, and take responsibility for them, your audience – the ones with whom your sensibilities resonate – will not only find you, but be enriched and nourished by your work.



With that, we said our goodbyes – but not before reminding everyone of our next Schmooze on November 14th:  TIME TRAVEL, BODY SWAPPING & OTHER WAY-COOL, REALITY-BENDING WAYS OF TELLING A STORY.  Come with examples of your favorite books in this genre and questions about your own off-kilter manuscripts.  Together, we’ll try to figure out what works, what doesn’t, and what really makes these stories tick.




Before we go, here are a few of those helpful links on querying we promised you…




(great source for info on agents!)


And a few more great leads, courtesy of Schmoozer Pat O’Brien:

Kristin Nelson at http://pubrants.blogspot.com/ has links on the right sidebar with specific examples of author queries to her that worked, as well as why she liked the queries.  She also includes some examples of her pitch letters to editors.

Janet Reid aka Query Shark has an agent site with query faq on sidebar and the query site where she tears into examples sent to her by brave souls.  http://jetreidliterary.blogspot.com/http://queryshark.blogspot.com/

Nathan Bransford, former agent who is now an author, has long been sharing how-to info on his site. http://blog.nathanbransford.com/  Look on the left sidebar for query advice and examples.


Best of luck Schmoozers – with your queries and with tackling complicated story ethics issues in your manuscripts!

Keep passing the open windows,
Charlie & Karol